Blake v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 52

ORDER re Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Continue Trial Setting, to which Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") has responded in its 44 Response to Order to Show Cause, and Plaintiff's 51 Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Defendant's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 39 Motion to Continue Trial Setting is DENIED. Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's 51 Motion to Extend Deadline, it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff� 39;s 46 Response to BANA's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 11/16/2012, and that BANA's reply to Plaintiff's response is due by 11/28/2012. The parties should not expect a ruling on BANA's 46 Motion for Summary Judg ment by the pretrial conference date of 1/3/2013. Additionally, the parties should be aware that this extension of the deadlines may result in the trial of this case being continued beyond the term of court commencing on 1/28/2013 in Opelika, Alabama. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/10/2012. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
SUSAN H. BLAKE,
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:11-cv-242-MEF
(WO— Do Not Publish)

ORDER
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial Setting
(Doc. #39), to which Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) has responded in its
Response to Order to Show Cause (Doc. #44), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Deadline
to Respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #51).
On October 9, 2012, at approximately 2:15 P.M., this Court held a hearing on
Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial Setting by conference call with counsel representing
Blake and BANA in attendance. Upon consideration of the parties’ filings and the
representations of counsel at the hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to
Continue Trial Setting is DENIED.
Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Deadline, it is further ORDERED
that Plaintiff’s response to BANA’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #46) is due by
November 16, 2012, and that BANA’s reply to Plaintiff’s response is due by November 28,
2012.
1

The parties should not expect a ruling on BANA’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. #46) by the pretrial conference date of January 3, 2013. Additionally, the parties
should be aware that this extension of the deadlines may result in the trial of this case being
continued beyond the term of court commencing on January 28, 2013, in Opelika, Alabama.
th

Done this the 10 day of October, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2