Partridge v. Randolph County (Wedowee, AL) et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 17

ORDER that 1. Plaintiff's objection 10 be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; 2. The recommendation of the magistrate judge 6 be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3. The plaintiff's claims against Judge W. P. Whaley b e and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); and 4. The plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be and the same are hereby REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/25/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CRAIG PARTRIDGE, #844679,
Plaintiff,
v.
RANDOLPH COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-247-ID
(WO)

ORDER
Before the court are the recommendation of the magistrate judge, (Doc. #6), and
plaintiff’s objection, (Doc. #10). Having conducted a de novo determination of those
portions of the recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. #10) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;

2.

The recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. #6) be and the same is
hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;

3.

The plaintiff’s claims against Judge W. P. Whaley be and the same are
hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in
accordance with the with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and
(iii); and

4.

The plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants be and the same are

1

hereby REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for appropriate
proceedings.
DONE this the 25th day of April, 2011.
/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2