Jones v. Russell County Sheriff Department et al (INMATE2)
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's false imprisonment claim is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 3. Plaintiffs claims against the Russell County Sheriffs Department are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 5/12/2011. (dmn)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CEDRIC M. JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
RUSSELL COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-290-ID
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should
be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s false imprisonment claim is DISMISSED without prejudice
pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
3.
Plaintiff’s claims against the Russell County Sheriff’s Department are
DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and
4.
This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process.
A separate judgment shall issue.
Done this 12 th day of May, 2011.
/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?