Jenkins v. Davis(MAG+)

Filing 42

ORDER: the court ADOPTS the 41 Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. 4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/2/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION ARTHUR L. JENKINS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. BRENT DAVIS, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv307-WHA (WO) ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #41), entered on June 14, 2012, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. 4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 2nd day of July, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?