Dixon v. Correctional Medical Services (INMATE1)

Filing 66

ORDERED that the 65 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; ORDERED as follows: 1) The Dfts' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Dfts; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/9/2014. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL JAMES DIXON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. JAY JONES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 3:11cv-323-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #65), entered on November 13, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #64) is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 9th day of December, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?