Williams v. Clarke et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
8
ORDER (1) ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge; (2) plf's complaint against defendants Warren, Lane, Ellis, Moore and Maxwell is DISMISSED without prejudice and prior to service of process; (3) defendants Warren, Lane, Ellis, Moore and Maxwell are DISMISSED as parties to the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); and (4) this case, with regard to the remaining def, is referred back to the Mag Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/9/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
_____________________________
JOHNNY MATEROUS WILLIAMS,
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
*
MALVIN CLARKE, et al.,
*
Defendants.
_____________________________
3:11-CV-475-TMH
(WO)
*
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #5) in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after
an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation
should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. the Recommendation (Doc. #5) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Warren, Lane, Ellis, Moore, and
Maxwell is DISMISSED without prejudice and prior to service of process;
3. Defendants Warren, Lane, Ellis, Moore, and Maxwell are DISMISSED as
parties to the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and
4. This case, with regard to the remaining defendant, is referred back to the
Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Done this 9 th day of August, 2011.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?