Avery v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/27/2011. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
TORIANO J. AVERY,
TORIANO J. AVERY,
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. d/b/a )
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, )
CIVIL ACTION NO.
asserting that defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., had
improperly serviced her loan and violated the automatic
In a previous opinion, this court
affirmed in part and reversed in part the bankruptcy
court’s grant of summary judgment Wells Fargo.
Avery, 434 B.R. 895 (M.D. Ala. 2010).
court denied summary judgment because there existed a
genuine issue of material fact as to the propriety of the
fees assessed by Wells Fargo, and because the bankruptcy
court had granted summary judgment on Avery’s Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act claim, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.,
though Wells Fargo had not moved for summary judgment on
The case was remanded to the bankruptcy
court to make proposed findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to those issues.
This lawsuit is now before the court on the proposed
findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United
States Bankruptcy Judge.
The bankruptcy judge finds that
judgment should be entered in favor of Wells Fargo.
There are no objections to the proposed findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
After an independent and de novo
conclusions of law should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 27th of June, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?