Dickinson v. Masan, et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 50

ORDER directing, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's objection (Doc. # 48 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The Recommendation of t he Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 47 ) is adopted; (3) The petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Shawn Dickinson is DENIED as it was not filed within the one-year period of limitation mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/6/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
SHAWN M. DICKINSON, #256934,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN MASAN, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-700-MEF
WO

ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE
of the court that:
1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #48) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed on December 20, 2013 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #47) filed on November 25,
2014 is adopted;
3. The petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Shawn Dickinson is DENIED as it
was not filed within the one-year period of limitation mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1),
and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this the 6th day of February, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE