Anthony v. Bulls Realty et al

Filing 63

ORDER directing the plaintiff to file with the Court an amended complaint that properly establishes federal subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity; failure to plead the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites by 11/27/2012 will result in dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/21/12. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DOROTHY ANTHONY, PLAINTIFF, v. BULLS REALTY, et al., DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:11-cv-735-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER On November 8, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff Dorothy Anthony (“Anthony” or “Plaintiff”) to file an Amended Complaint to specifically establish the Defendants’ citizenship. (Doc. #60.) On November 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint, attempting to meet the jurisdictional pleading requirements of this Order; however, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint fails to set forth the necessary allegations to establish a proper basis for federal diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Bulls Realty and Blanchet Villas, Ltd. are citizens of Alabama. Yet Plaintiff does not allege the state of Bulls Realty’s incorporation. Nor does she allege the citizenship of each partner of Blanchet Villas, Ltd. See Rolling Green MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings, L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1021 (11th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file with the Court an Amended Complaint that properly establishes federal subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity. Failure to plead the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites by November 27, 2012 will result in dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction. DONE this the 21st day of November, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?