Allen v. Auburn Housing Authority et al
Filing
53
ORDER that 52 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED; that Defendants' Oral Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; that Defendants' 37 , 40 and 49 pending motions are denied as moot; that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Ms. Allen's abandonment of her claims, failure to comply with the orders of this court, and failure to prosecute this action; that a separate final judgment will be issued. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/27/2012.(cc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARISSE ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
AUBURN HOUSING AUTHORITY,
STAR PASCHAL, and
LEE EASTMAN,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-836-WKW
ORDER
On July 11, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation. (Doc. # 52.)
No timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 52) is ADOPTED;
2.
Defendants’ oral motion to dismiss is GRANTED;
3.
Defendants’ pending motions (Docs. # 37, 40 & 49) are DENIED as
moot; and
4.
this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Ms. Allen’s abandonment
of her claims, failure to comply with the orders of this court, and failure
to prosecute this action.
A separate final judgment will be issued.
DONE this 27th day of July, 2012.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?