Spurlock v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The 12 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The 28 USC § 2255 motion is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the § 2255 motion was filed after expiration of the applicable limitation period. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/19/2014. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
JEFFREY AARON SPURLOCK,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-0918-MEF
WO

ORDER
On February 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #12) in
this case. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with
prejudice because the § 2255 motion was filed after expiration of the applicable limitation
period.
DONE this the 19th day of March, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE