Johnston v. U-Haul International, Inc. et al
Filing
214
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/11/13. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
TAMMY JOHNSTON,
Individually and as Next
Friend and Legal Guardian
of H.M.W., a minor child,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., )
a Corporation, et al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:11cv981-MHT
(WO)
OPINION
On May 30, 2013, this lawsuit came before the court
for a hearing on a motion for compromise of claims,
seeking
consideration and approval of the full and final
settlement of the claims of plaintiff Tammy Johnston on
behalf of the minor H.M.W. against defendants U-Haul
International,
Inc.,
Partnership
(d/b/a
Enterprises,
Inc.
Sovran
Uncle
(d/b/a
Acquisition
Bob’s
Two
Men
Self
and
Limited
Storage),
CJR
a
and
Truck),
Katherine Miller (as administrator of the estate of Irene
Katherine
Miller).
The
court’s
consideration
and
approval is necessary because the settlement involves
H.M.W., a minor child.
Pursuant to the court’s order,
H.M.W.’s interests are represented by guardian ad litem
Karen Mastin Laneaux.
representations
made
Based on the filings and the
in
open
court,
the
court
will
approve the settlement.
This
case
arises
out
of
a
two-car
accident.
According to the allegations in the complaint, on January
21, 2011, then 10-year-old H.M.W. was a passenger in a
car with her grandparents and a cousin when the car was
struck by a vehicle with an attached U-Haul trailer.
H.M.W. and her cousin were pulled from the car but the
grandparents perished in the wreckage.
H.M.W. contends
that the vehicle that struck her lost control due in part
to it having a U-Haul trailer attached that was too large
for the type of car and that trailer being excessively
loaded
in
an
unsafe
manner.
physical and mental injuries.
2
H.M.W.
suffered
both
Under the terms of the proposed settlement, H.M.W
will receive $ 371,250 from U-Haul and Sovran, $ 375,000
from CJR, and $ 22,000 from the estate of Miller.
gross recovery will be, in total, $ 768,250.
Her
From that,
after costs and attorney’s fees (at a rate of 40 % after
costs) are deducted, H.M.W. will be left with a recovery
of $ 447,088.97.
The court has reviewed the filings in this case and
is familiar with the background of this lawsuit.
court
received
testimony
and
evidence
related
The
to
liability, the injuries sustained by H.M.W., and the cost
of H.M.W.’s medical care.
The court concludes that the
liability of the defendants is in dispute, as is the
extent of the damages from the accident.
The court also
heard testimony from H.M.W.’s grandmother (Johnston),
H.M.W.’s mother, and the guardian ad litem, all of whom
stated that they believe the settlement is in H.M.W.’s
best interests.
3
The court is satisfied that the terms and provisions
of this settlement are understood and agreed to by all
parties.
Based on the record and testimony, as set forth
above, the court finds that all the terms and provisions
of the proposed settlement are in the best interests of
the minor child H.M.W. and are fair, just, and reasonable
under the circumstances of this case.
Therefore, the
court will approve the proposed settlement agreement.
***
An appropriate judgment will be entered granting the
pending motion for compromise of claims and approving and
adopting the proposed settlement as to H.M.W.
DONE, this the 11th day of June, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?