Halsey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 52

ORDER: It is ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff George Michael Halsey, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha Josephine Halsey, Deceased, and Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company must inform the Court of whether consent is given for video recording and whether there are any limitations on that consent by completing and filing with the Court the form appended hereto no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, 1/24/2013. If consent is given, the court will assume that all proceedings in this case--other than jury selection and any other proceedings or portions of proceedings specified to be excluded onthe form attached--can be recorded. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/22/2013. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION GEORGE MICHAEL HALSEY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARTHA JOSEPHINE HALSEY, DECEASED, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1092-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER The Middle District of Alabama is participating in a nationwide pilot program to evaluate the effectiveness of cameras in federal courtrooms. This pilot program applies to civil cases only. No proceedings may be recorded without the approval of the presiding judge, and parties must consent to the recording of each proceeding in a case. The recordings will be made publicly available on uscourts.gov and may also be on local participating court websites at the court’s discretion. Proceedings will not be broadcast live. The Judicial Conference of the United States website, located at http://www.uscourts.gov/multimedia/cameras.aspx, provides a detailed overview of the pilot program. It is ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff George Michael Halsey, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha Josephine Halsey, Deceased, and Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company must inform the Court of whether consent is given for video recording and whether there are any limitations on that consent by completing and filing with the Court the form appended hereto no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 24, 2013. If consent is given, the court will assume that all proceedings in this case--other than jury selection and any other proceedings or portions of proceedings specified to be excluded on the form attached--can be recorded. DONE this the 22nd day of January, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION GEORGE MICHAEL HALSEY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARTHA JOSEPHINE HALSEY, DECEASED, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1092-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR VIDEO RECORDING Pursuant to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management Guidelines for the Cameras Pilot Project in the District Courts, this Court requests that the proceedings in the above-captioned case be video recorded. On behalf of [party name] and any witnesses called by [party name] in this case, [party name] consents to the following (please check the appropriate box): [ ] Consent is given to video-record all proceedings in this case.1 [ ] Consent is not given to video-record some, but not all, of the proceedings in this case. [] Consent is not given to record the following proceedings and/or parts 1. Even where full consent is given, the jury selection process will never be video recorded. of proceedings (you may, but are not required to, provide an explanation for why these proceedings and portions of proceedings should not be recorded): _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ [] Consent is not given to record the testimony of the following witnesses (you may, but are not required to, provide an explanation for why these witnesses should not be recorded): _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ [] Consent is not given to record any of the proceedings in this case (you may, but are not required to, provide an explanation for why consent is not given): _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Signature of Attorney: Date:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?