Patterson v. Clark et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 34

ORDER AND OPINION that the 31 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The plaintiff's claims against a Macon County commissioner and the Mayor of Macon County are dismissed with prejudice prior to service o f process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). 2. The aforementioned defendants are dismissed as defendants in this cause of action. 3. This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against defendants Clark and Wayne, are referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/18/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER LAMAR PATTERSON, AIS # 275030, Plaintiff, v. MELVIN CLARK, Jail Administrator, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv77-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On August 24, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 31). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The plaintiff’s claims against a Macon County commissioner and the Mayor of Macon County are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). 2. The aforementioned defendants are dismissed as defendants in this cause of 3. This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against defendants Clark action. and Wayne, are referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings. Done this 18th day of September, 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?