Sistrunk v. Jones, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 23

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED; for the reason that the Plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, and because he has been released from t he Lee County Detention Center, his claims are moot, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (). This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; (2) Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff; (3) Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on February 3, 2015. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. JAY JONES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 3:12cv-119-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22), entered on January 13, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. For the reason that the Plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, and because he has been released from the Lee County Detention Center, his claims are moot, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 2. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 3rd day of February, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?