Sistrunk v. Jones, et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
23
ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED; for the reason that the Plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, and because he has been released from t he Lee County Detention Center, his claims are moot, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (). This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; (2) Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff; (3) Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on February 3, 2015. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
JAY JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 3:12cv-119-WHA
(WO)
ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22),
entered on January 13, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and
after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. For the reason that the Plaintiff
seeks only injunctive relief, and because he has been released from the Lee County Detention
Center, his claims are moot, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
2. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
DONE this 3rd day of February, 2015.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?