Speir v. Astrue
ORDERED that Plf's 28 Motion for Attorney Fee be and hereby is DENIED with leave to refile subject to Plf counsel's filing with the Court affidavits demonstrating the fee agreement between Plf and Plf's counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/30/2016. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WILLIAM ANDREW SPEIR,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security, )
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-328-TFM
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 28) filed
April 21, 2015, wherein she seeks $8,520.00 in attorney fees under the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Fees
under this provision are awarded from claimant’s past due benefits, are capped at 25 percent of
the total of the past-due benefits and are based upon a contract between Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s
counsel and must be reasonable. Upon review of the invoice submitted by Plaintiff’s counsel, the
Court determined that the “rates set for the litigation support staff . . .[were] not reasonable.”
(Doc. 36 ). Thereafter, Plaintiff submitted a revised bill for services in the amount of $2,462.00.
Although the Court continues to have concerns about the number of support staff billing time to
this matter, the Court finds that the overall amount for services sought is reasonable.
The Court notes, however, that Plaintiff’s Counsel represented in her Motion for Fees that
the Motion was supported by her affidavit and an “affidavit of plaintiff”. (Doc. 28) However,
neither of these affidavits have ever been filed with the Court. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fee be and hereby is DENIED with leave
to refile subject to Plaintiff counsel’s filing with the Court the above affidavits demonstrating the
fee agreement between Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel.
DONE this 30th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?