Alexander v. Warr et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
18
ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation 15 of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The motion to dismiss filed by the defendants is GRANTED to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust a n administrative remedy currently available to him at the Russell County Jail; and 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy presently available to him at the Russell County Jail. A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/30/2013. (jg, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARLES GRANT ALEXANDER,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. S. WARR, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-573-TMH
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 15) in this case to which no
timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an
independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation (Doc. 15) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. The motion to dismiss filed by the defendants is GRANTED to the extent the
defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an
administrative remedy currently available to him at the Russell County Jail; and
3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C.
ยง 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy presently available
to him at the Russell County Jail.
A separate judgment shall issue.
Done this the 30th day of January, 2013.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?