Edwards v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 11

ORDER ON MOTION that the Motion to Amend 9 is GRANTED; that on or before September 18, 2013, the Government shall file a supplemental response as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 8/19/2013. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
SHEAMEAKA LASHAUN EDWARDS,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 3:12cv717-WHA
(WO)

ORDER ON MOTION
The petitioner has filed a pro se pleading (Doc. No. 9), which the court has construed
to be a Motion to Amend her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to present a new claim for relief.
Upon consideration of this motion, it is
ORDERED that the Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED.
It is further
ORDERED that on or before September 18, 2013, the Government shall file a
supplemental response addressing the new claim presented by the petitioner in the Motion
to Amend.
In filing its supplemental response, the Government should make specific reference
to the limitation period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). The supplemental response should
contain a procedural history and all relevant information from which the court can determine
the applicability of the limitation period to the new claim presented by the petitioner. In
addition, if this court is barred from reviewing the petitioner’s new claim due to the

petitioner’s failure to properly preserve such claim, the Government should provide a factual
and legal basis for the procedural default argument.
Done this 19th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2