Edwards v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 16

ORDER directing that, no timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 15 ), entered on September 3, 2014, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED, as it was not filed within the controlling federal limitation period. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/29/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION SHEAMEAKA LASHAUN EDWARDS, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:12-cv-717-WHA (WO) ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #15), entered on September 3, 2014, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 motion is DENIED, as it was not filed within the controlling federal limitation period. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 29th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?