Edwards v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 16

ORDER directing that, no timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 15 ), entered on September 3, 2014, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED, as it was not filed within the controlling federal limitation period. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/29/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION

SHEAMEAKA LASHAUN EDWARDS,
Petitioner,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-717-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(Doc. #15), entered on September 3, 2014, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED, as it was not filed within the
controlling federal limitation period. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 29th day of September, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE