Rowell v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 28

ORDER that the 25 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because this case is barred by the one-year statute of limitations established by 28 USC § 2244(d). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/6/2016. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION SCOTTIE FITZGERALD ROWELL, Petitioner, vs. KENNETH JONES, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO 3:13-cv-124-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #25), entered on May 20, 2016. After being granted an extension of time to file an objection, no timely objection has been filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because this case is barred by the one-year statute of limitations established by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). DONE this 6th day of July, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?