Sanford v. SCA, Inc. (MAG+)
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 44 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and that dft's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/28/2014. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13cv153-MHT
Relying on 42 U.S.C. § 1981, plaintiff charges defendant with retaliatory discharge from
her employment. On March 4, 2014, the magistrate judge filed a recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. Upon consideration of the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED and
ADJUDGED that the recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. # 44) is adopted and that
defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 30) is granted.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The court will enter final judgment in defendant’s favor on plaintiff’s sole remaining claim.
Done this the 28th day of March, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?