Pritchett v. Farr et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 47

ORDER that the 39 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 3/11/2015 pleading, which the court considers to be a Motion to Dismiss Dft Derek Farr (Doc. # 32 ) is GRANTED; 2) Dft Derek Farr is DISMSISED with prej udice as a party to the Complaint; 3) The 34 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED as moot; 4) This case with respect to the remaining Dft is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/20/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION

PETER PRITCHETT, JR., #284 708,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
POLICE OFFICER DEREK FARR, et al.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:13cv-712-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #39),
entered on March 23, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and
after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1. Plaintiff’s March 11, 2015 pleading, which the court considers to be a Motion to
Dismiss Defendant Derek Farr (Doc. #32) is GRANTED.
2. Defendant Derek Farr is DISMSISED with prejudice as a party to the Complaint.
3. The Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #34) is DENIED as moot.
4. This case with respect to the remaining Defendant is referred back to the Magistrate
Judge for further proceedings.
DONE this 20th_ day of April, 2015.

/s/
W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE