Watts v. City of Opelika, Alabama et al

Filing 48

ORDERED as follows: (1) All claims against defendant Joshua Combs are dismissed except for plaintiff Calvin Watts's § 1983 Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim (Count I) and his state-law assault-and-battery claim (Count X), which remain pending. (2) Plaintiff Combs's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 24 ) is denied as moot with respect to the dismissed claims and remains pending with respect to the excessive-force and assault-and-battery claims. (3) The magistrate judge� 39;s report and recommendation (doc. no. 43 ) and plaintiff Combs's objections (doc. no. 44 ) are moot as to the dismissed claims and remain pending with respect to the excessive-force and assault-and-battery claims. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/23/2015. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION CALVIN WATTS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA COMBS, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13cv742-MHT (WO) ORDER Based on the representations made on the record at a pretrial hearing on November 23, 2015, and by agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) All claims against defendant Joshua Combs are dismissed except for plaintiff Calvin Watts’s § 1983 Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim (Count I) and his state-law assault-and-battery claim (Count X), which remain pending. (2) Plaintiff Combs’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 24) is denied as moot with respect to the dismissed claims and remains pending with respect to the excessive-force and assault-and-battery claims. (3) The recommendation magistrate (doc. no. judge’s 43) and report plaintiff and Combs’s objections (doc. no. 44) are moot as to the dismissed claims and remain pending with respect to the excessive-force and assault-and-battery claims. DONE, this the 23rd day of November, 2015. _ /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?