Walton v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 19

ORDER that the 16 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred by theone-year limitation period contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/8/2016. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH ROGNET WALTON, #284261, Petitioner, vs. WILLIE THOMAS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:13cv-831-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on January 29, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred by the one-year limitation period contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 8th day of March, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?