James v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 7

ORDER directing as follows: (1) Mr. James' objections (Doc. # 5 .) are OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 4 .) is ADOPTED; further ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (iii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/10/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
WILLIAM BERNARD JAMES,
#277487,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALBERT
L. JOHNSON, Circuit Judge,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-918-WKW
(WO)

ORDER
On January 7, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case.
(Doc. # 4.) On January 14, 2014, Plaintiff William Bernard James filed objections.
(Doc. # 5.) The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those
portions of the Recommendation to which the objections are made. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). The court concludes that the objections are without merit, and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Mr. James’ objections (Doc. # 5.) are OVERRULED;

2.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 4.) is ADOPTED;

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice
prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (iii).
DONE this 10th day of March, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE