James v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER directing as follows: (1) Mr. James' objections (Doc. # 5 .) are OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 4 .) is ADOPTED; further ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (iii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/10/14. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WILLIAM BERNARD JAMES,
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALBERT
L. JOHNSON, Circuit Judge,
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-918-WKW
On January 7, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case.
(Doc. # 4.) On January 14, 2014, Plaintiff William Bernard James filed objections.
(Doc. # 5.) The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those
portions of the Recommendation to which the objections are made. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). The court concludes that the objections are without merit, and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
Mr. James’ objections (Doc. # 5.) are OVERRULED;
The Recommendation (Doc. # 4.) is ADOPTED;
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice
prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (iii).
DONE this 10th day of March, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?