McCurdy v. Auburn University et al

Filing 46

ORDER: The defendants object to plaintiff Dorothy McCurdy's second amended complaint, arguing that it is futile because it fails to state a plausible claim for relief. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying opinion on the motion to dismiss, the 32 Objection is overruled. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/4/2015. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

DOROTHY McCURDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
AUBURN UNIVERSITY,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:14cv226-MHT
(WO)

ORDER
The

defendants

object

to

plaintiff

Dorothy

McCurdy’s second amended complaint, arguing that it is
futile because it fails to state a plausible claim for
relief.

For the reasons discussed in the accompanying

opinion on the motion to dismiss, the objection (doc.
no. 32) is overruled.
DONE, this the 4th day of May, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE