Felder v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
15
OPINION and ORDER as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 14 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 8 Recommendation is adopted. (3) Plaintiffs claims against defendants Thomas, Jones, Giles, and Mason are dismissed wit h prejudice, and these defendants are terminated as parties.(4) Plaintiffs claim against defendant Jenkins is dismissed without prejudice, and this defendant is terminated as a party. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/6/2014. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
CECIL FELDER,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:14cv911-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, an inmate,
filed this lawsuit challenging prison officials’ delay
in providing him medical care after an accident.
This
lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s
claims against several defendants be dismissed.
before
the
court
recommendation.
review
of
plaintiff’s
the
are
plaintiff’s
After
an
record,
objections
objections
independent
the
should
court
be
and
to
Also
the
de
novo
concludes
that
overruled
magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
and
the
(1) Plaintiff's
objections
(doc.
no.
14)
are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 8) is adopted.
(3) Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Thomas,
Jones, Giles, and Mason are dismissed with prejudice,
and these defendants are terminated as parties.
(4) Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Jenkins is
dismissed
without
prejudice,
and
this
defendant
is
terminated as a party.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred
back to the magistrate judge.
DONE, this the 6th day of November, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?