Williams v. McCray et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Filing
37
ORDER directing that: (1) the def's 36 Objections are OVERRULED; (2) the 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (3) def's 31 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in its entirety; this action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/18/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
LANDON WILLIAMS,
v.
J. KEITH McCRAY, an individual, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
LANDON WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID M. WARREN,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-43-WKW
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-476-WKW
ORDER
On March 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 35)
to which Defendant David M. Warren timely filed objections (Doc. # 36). The court
has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of the
Recommendation to which objections are made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The
court concludes that the objections are without merit and that the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1)
Defendant’s objections (Doc. # 36) are OVERRULED;
(2)
The Recommendation (Doc. # 35) is ADOPTED;
(3)
Defendant Warren’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 31) is DENIED in its
entirety.
This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings.
DONE this 18th day of May, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?