Hughley v. Lee County, Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Filing
11
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) The Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. nos. 6 and 9 ) are adopted. (2) Plaintiff's 10 Objection is overruled. (3) To the extent plaintiff bring s claims for damages against defendant Luther Strange in his official capacity, those claims are dismissed with prejudice. (4) To the extent plaintiff seeks damages from defendant Eric Holder in his official capacity, those claims are dismissed with prejudice. (5) To the extent plaintiff seeks damages against defendants Holder and Strange in their individual capacities, and against Lee County and Chambers County, plaintiffs claims are dismissed without prejudice. (6) Plaintiffs claims against at torney John Tinney are dismissed without prejudice. (7) Defendant Tinneys motion to dismiss (doc. no. 3 ) is denied as moot. (8) This action is referred back to the magistratejudge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/8/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
JOHNNY HUGHLEY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA,
et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:15cv126-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
Upon
an
independent
and
de
novo
review
of
the
record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court that:
(1)
The
recommendations
of
the
United
States
Magistrate Judge (doc. nos. 6 and 9) are adopted.
(2)
Plaintiff’s
objection
(doc.
no.
10)
is
claims
for
overruled.
(3)
damages
To
the
against
extent
plaintiff
defendant
Luther
brings
Strange
in
his
official
capacity,
those
claims
are
dismissed
with
prejudice.
(4)
To
the
extent
plaintiff
seeks
damages
from
defendant Eric Holder in his official capacity, those
claims are dismissed with prejudice.
(5) To the extent plaintiff seeks damages against
defendants
Holder
and
Strange
in
their
individual
capacities, and against Lee County and Chambers County,
plaintiff’s claims are dismissed without prejudice.
(6) Plaintiff’s claims against attorney John Tinney
are dismissed without prejudice.
(7) Defendant Tinney’s motion to dismiss (doc. no.
3) is denied as moot.
(8) This action is referred back to the magistrate
judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 8th day of May, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?