Lilly v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 16

ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 13 Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Diane Lilly's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1 ) is DENIED, and that Plaintiff's remaining claims are REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on June 2, 2015. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DIANE LILLY, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:15-CV-194-WKW ) [WO] ) ) ) ORDER On May 6, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 13.) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Diane Lilly’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1) is DENIED, and that Plaintiff’s remaining claims are REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 2nd day of May, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?