Martin v. Auburn Police Department et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
11
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 9 recommendation is adopted. (2) The case is dismissed with prejudice to the extent the claims presented in the complaint are bar red by the statute of limitations and without prejudice as to those claims challenging the constitutionality of the plaintiffs state criminal conviction. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/30/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
SILAS MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:15cv307-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of
the court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 9) is adopted.
(2) The case is dismissed with prejudice to the
extent the claims presented in the complaint are barred
by the statute of limitations and without prejudice as
to those claims challenging the constitutionality of
the plaintiff’s state criminal conviction.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 30th day of June, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?