Brooks v. McDonald et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 58

ORDER directing that (1) plf's 57 objections are OVERRULED; (2) the 56 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (3) def's 40 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (4) plf's 44 , 48 , and 51 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED; (5) this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/13/16. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
DANNY L. BROOKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT MCDONALD, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-383-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On May 25, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 56)
to which Plaintiff timely filed objections (Doc. # 57). The court has conducted an
independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which
objections are made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court concludes that the
objections are without merit and that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is due
to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. # 57) are OVERRULED;

(2)

The Recommendation (Doc. # 56) is ADOPTED;

(3)

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 40) is GRANTED;

(4)

Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. # 44, 48, 51) are

DENIED;
(5)

This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 13th day of June, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE