Bartlett v. Jones (INMATE 2)

Filing 29

ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The US Magistrate Judge's 28 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) Dft's 9 motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, 12 motion for summary judgment be and are hereby GRANTED; 3) Costs are taxed against Plf for which execution may issue; An appropriate Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/31/2018. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION JAKE BARTLETT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JAY JONES, Defendant. CIV. ACT. NO. 3:15cv577-ECM [WO] ORDER On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 28). After an independent and de novo review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (doc. # 28) be and is hereby ADOPTED. (2) Defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (docs. # 9 and 12) be and are hereby GRANTED. (3) Costs are taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue. An appropriate Judgment will be entered. DONE this 31st day of August, 2018. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?