Robinson v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Filing 38

ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's 36 Objection is OVERRULED; 2. The 35 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3. The 5 Motion to Remand is DENIED; and 4. This case is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/16/2016. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
LILLIAN ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-670-WKW

ORDER
On April 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case.
(Doc. # 35.) Plaintiff filed an Objection on April 22, 2016 (Doc. # 36), and
Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. # 37). The court has made a de novo determination
of those portions of the Recommendation to which Plaintiff objects and has
independently reviewed the file. As set forth in the Recommendation, Defendant
properly removed this action, and the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over
Plaintiff’s claims. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441. Accordingly, it is ORDERED
as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. # 36) is OVERRULED;

2.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 35) is ADOPTED;

3.

The Motion to Remand (Doc. # 5) is DENIED; and

4.

This case is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.
DONE this 16th day of May, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2