Hollis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 37

ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. # 36 ) are OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 35 ) is ADOPTED; and. (3) Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/20/2019. (kh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
SHEDRICK D. HOLLIS,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 3:16-CV-351-WKW
)
[WO]
)
)
)
ORDER

The Magistrate Judge has entered a Recommendation that Petitioner Shedrick
D. Hollis’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence be
denied. (Doc. # 35.) Plaintiff has filed objections. (Doc. # 36.) Based upon an
independent and de novo review of the Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
the court finds that the Recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and
conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. # 36) are OVERRULED;

(2)

The Recommendation (Doc. # 35) is ADOPTED; and.

(3)

Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED.

A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 20th day of February, 2019.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE