Holloway v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
Filing
20
ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 19 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED because it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. 2244(d);(3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/5/18. (djy, ) .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ROSCOE LEWIS HOLLOWAY, # 154358,
Petitioner,
v.
LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:16cv395-WHA
[WO]
ORDER
On May 7, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely
objections have been filed. (Doc. # 19.) Upon an independent review of the record and
upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 19) is ADOPTED.
(2) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. # 19)
is DENIED because it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28
U.S.C. § 2244(d).
(3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 5th day of June, 2018.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton, III
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?