Smith v. Credit Control, LLC
ORDER as follows: 1. The 20 Recommendation is ADOPTED. 2. Defendant Credit Control, LLC's 16 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's Pamela Smith's action against Defendant Credit Control, LLC, is DISMISSED without prejudice as further set out in the order. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/30/2017. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CREDIT CONTROL, LLC,
) CASE NO. 3:16-CV-416-WKW
On December 28, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 20.) Upon an independent
review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is
ORDERED as follows:
The Recommendation (Doc. # 20) is ADOPTED.
Defendant Credit Control, LLC’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 16) is
Plaintiff Pamela Smith’s action against Defendant Credit Control, LLC,
is DISMISSED without prejudice. “[E]ven a non-lawyer should realize the peril to
her case, when she . . . ignores numerous notices . . . . Even a non-lawyer should
realize the need to communicate either with the court or with opposing counsel.”
Anthony v. Marion Cty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1167-69 (5th Cir. 1980).1
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 30th day of March, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
See Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc) (adopting as
binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close
of business on September 30, 1981).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?