Bossio v. Bishop et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1. The 75 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's 78 Objections are OVERRULED. 3. The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. 4. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/13/2018. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
HECTOR MANUEL BOSSIO, JR.,
) CASE NO. 3:16-CV-839-ECM
CPL DORA BISHOP (HUNTER), et al.,
O R D E R
On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 75), that the
plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. The plaintiff timely objected to the
Recommendation. (Doc. # 78). Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and the
Recommendation, the plaintiff’s objections are due to be overruled and the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 75) is ADOPTED.
2. The plaintiff’s objections (doc. # 78) are OVERRULED.
3. The plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED.
4. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Done this 13th day of September, 2018.
/s/Emily C. Marks
EMILY C. MARKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?