Bossio v. Bishop et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 79

ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1. The 75 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's 78 Objections are OVERRULED. 3. The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. 4. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/13/2018. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
HECTOR MANUEL BOSSIO, JR.,
#394364,

)
)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 3:16-CV-839-ECM
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CPL DORA BISHOP (HUNTER), et al.,
Defendants.

O R D E R 
 On August 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. # 75), that the
plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. The plaintiff timely objected to the
Recommendation. (Doc. # 78). Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and the
Recommendation, the plaintiff’s objections are due to be overruled and the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. # 75) is ADOPTED.
2. The plaintiff’s objections (doc. # 78) are OVERRULED.
3. The plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED.
4. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Done this 13th day of September, 2018.

/s/Emily C. Marks
EMILY C. MARKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE