Burton v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 16

OPINION and ORDER: The 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs claims challenging events which occurred on or before 10/24/2012, are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (i) as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint regarding these allegations within the time prescribed by the statute of limitations. 2. Plaintiffs challenge to the constitutionality of his 2012 conviction and/or sentence imposed upon him by the Circui t Court for Lee County, Alabama, are DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. 3. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/30/2018. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MORGAN BURTON, JR., #185 425, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JOHN CROW, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-93-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered July 16, 2018. Doc. 13. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on an independent and de novo review of the record, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED and it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s claims challenging events which occurred on or before October 24, 2012, are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint regarding these allegations within the time prescribed by the statute of limitations. 2. Plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of his 2012 conviction and/or sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit Court for Lee County, Alabama, are DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. 3. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii). An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered. Done, this 30th day of August 2018. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?