Brown v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 14

ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The Magistrate Judge's 8 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's claims against the Russell County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) Th e Russell County Jail is DISMISSED as a Dft in this action; 4) This action, with respect to Plf's claims against Dfts Dyer and Randall, is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/2/2018. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION MAURICE ANTONIO BROWN, Plaintiff, v. RUSSELL COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:18-CV-576-WKW [WO] ORDER On July 12, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 8) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 8) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff’s claims against the Russell County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. The Russell County Jail is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this action. 4. This action, with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Dyer and Randall, is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. DONE this 2nd day of August, 2018. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?