Bradley v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plf's 10 objection is OVERRULED; (2) The 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and (3) This action with respect to Plf's claims against the remaining Dfts is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/6/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
STACEY R. BRADLEY, JR.,
PARTNERS, et al.,
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-639-WKW
On July 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 5) to
which Plaintiff filed a timely objection (Doc. # 10). Plaintiff’s objection, however,
is not responsive to the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that the Randolph County Jail
“is not a legal entity subject to suit.” (Doc. # 5, at 2.) Accordingly, it is ORDERED
Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 10) is OVERRULED;
The Recommendation (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED; and
This action with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining
Defendants is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE this 6th day of August, 2018.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?