Grissom v. Verizon Wireless, Inc. (MAG+)

Filing 29

ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The objection (Doc. # 28 ) is OVERRULED; 2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 26 ) is ADOPTED; and 3) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/16/2019. (cnw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CHRISTIAN ANDRE GRISSOM,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
VERIZON WIRELESS, INC.,
Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:19-CV-193-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On November 15, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc.
# 26) to which Plaintiff filed an objection (Doc. # 28). Based upon a de novo review
of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b), it is ORDERED as follows:
(1)

The objection (Doc. # 28) is OVERRULED;

(2)

The Recommendation (Doc. # 26) is ADOPTED; and

(3)

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) prior to service of process.
Final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 16th day of December, 2019.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE