Pendleton v. Martin et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 7

ORDER: There being no timely objections filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, the 6 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of Plf to comply with the orders of the Court and to prosecute this action. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/1/2021. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
ARTAVIS PENDLETON, #247 017,

)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 3:20-CV-1041-WHA-CSC
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
RAY MARTIN, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
This case is before the Court on a Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on
March 10, 2021. Doc. 6. There being no timely objections filed to the Recommendation, and after
an independent review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of Plaintiff to
comply with the orders of the Court and to prosecute this action.
Final Judgment will be entered separately.
Done, this 1st day of April 2021.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE