McLendon v. Wilson et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 39

ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1.) The 38 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2.) The 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Dfts; 3.) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4.) No costs are taxed. A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. on 9/25/2024. (BES)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
DREW BARRY McLENDON,
Plaintiff,
v.
SGT. WILSON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:21-cv-359-RAH

ORDER
Before the Court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed September
3, 2024 (Doc. 38), to which no objections have been filed. Based upon an independent
and de novo review of the Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation (Doc. 38) is ADOPTED;
2. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20) is GRANTED in favor of the
Defendants;
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice;
4. No costs are taxed.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
DONE, on this the 25th day of September 2024.

R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE