Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 10

ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that the 9 Recommendation is ADOPTED and this petition is DISMISSED without prejudice; Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 7/9/2024. (BES)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION JAMES BAILEY, AIS 187785, Petitioner, v. WARDEN ANTONIO McCLAIN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:24-CV-157-RAH-KFP ORDER On June 10, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 9.) Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED and this petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. Final judgment will be entered separately. DONE, on this the 9th day of July 2024. R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?