Jackson v. Amerson et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION, as set out. Signed by Judge Inge P Johnson on 6/1/12. (CTS, )
2012 Jun-01 AM 10:52
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
TERENCE DEVONTA! JACKSON, )
OFFICER STAHELY, et al.,
Case No. 1:09-cv-02175-IPJ-HGD
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on April 18, 2012,
recommending that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and this
cause be dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed by any party.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court
file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the
magistrate judge’s report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his
recommendation is ACCEPTED. The court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no
genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a
matter of law. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be
Page 1 of 2
GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final
Judgment will be entered.
DONE this 1st day of June 2012.
INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?