Brooks v. Rathman
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 10/11/12. (ASL)
2012 Oct-11 AM 11:32
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JOHN T. RATHMAN, Warden,
Case No. 1:11-cv-00197-WMA-HGD
On September 13, 2012, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was
entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file
objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. After obtaining an
extension of time, petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation on September 25, 2012.1
After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation and the petitioner’s objections thereto, the court hereby
ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the
recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus
be denied and that petitioner’s motion for summary judgment be denied.
Petitioner has objected to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation only with
respect to Incident Report #1734613.
Page 1 of 2
A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered
DONE this 11th day of October, 2012.
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?