New v. Mullins et al
Filing
21
ORDER: Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 10/18/12. (CVA)
FILED
2012 Oct-19 AM 08:33
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
MARK A NEW,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
) Case No. 1:11-cv-998-AKK-TMP
)
JAMES MULLINS, Warden;
)
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF )
THE STATE OF ALABAMA,
)
)
Respondents.
)
ORDER
On August 27, 2012 , the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation
in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and dismissed. Petitioner filed a motion
for an extension of time in which to file any objections, and the motion was granted,
giving petitioner until October 11, 2012, to file any objections. To date, no
objections have been filed by either party.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the
court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that
the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is
ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is hereby
DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Done the 18th day of October, 2012.
________________________________
ABDUL K. KALLON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?