Tucker v. United States of America

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Inge P Johnson on 3/17/14. (ASL)

Download PDF
FILED 2014 Mar-17 PM 01:09 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION RODNEY E. TUCKER Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:11-cv-8045-IPJ-PWG 1:09-cr-0165-IPJ-PWG MEMORANDUM OPINION On February 27, 2014, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The petitioner filed objections to the report and recommendation on March 13, 2014. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the petitioner’s objections thereto, the court is of the opinion that the petitioner’s objections are due to be and hereby are OVERRULED, the magistrate judge’s report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petitioner’s motion to expand the record (doc. 13) is GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the above-styled cause is due to be and the same is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DATED this 17th day of March, 2014. INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?