Santiago-Lugo v. Rathman
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 8/30/13. (SAC )
2013 Aug-30 PM 02:55
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JOHN T. RATHMAN, Warden,
Case No. 1:12-cv-04065-WMA-HGD
On August 15, 2013, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was
entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file
objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On August 22,
2013, petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
Although the court has serious doubts about whether petitioner’s objections are
specific enough to meet the standards set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), the court
has given de novo consideration to the case.
After full consideration of the record, including the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation, and the petitioner’s objections thereto, the court hereby
OVERRULES the objections, and ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The
court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition
Page 1 of 2
for writ of habeas corpus be denied and that petitioner’s motion for summary
judgment be denied.
A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered
DONE this 30th day of August, 2013.
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?